I recently went for two books I adored when I was younger to see how they stood up now. I’m always amazed. the Narnia books, for example, which I thought were as wide as a whole world, are short, with much less description than you can see in those vast snowy vistas in your head. Anne of Green Gables is not, in fact, a hilarious comedy about a girl getting into scrapes as I firmly believed at 9, but a completely heartbreaking story about unusual families feeling their way to love, and the real sniveller is not Matthew dying (though that never gets any easier), but Marilla, so slow to take to Anne with an ‘e’, but so adoring when she finally does.
Anyway, the first was Little Lord Fauntelroy, as I remembered loving it and it’s what my mum calls Wallace, from when he had a full head of glorious golden curls as a toddler (now a thick mop of unruly brown). This story, of an angelic poor American child taming a crusty English Earl was a huge hit in its day. Now it might be seen as the absolute height of emetic high Victorianism and their cult of the perfect innocent child. Fauntelroy is SO perfect, So loveable, SO amazingly well-behaved at all times that it staggers the senses and completely belies any real children in existence. It’s fallen out of fashion recently, and it’s very easy to see why; I don’t think I’ll be reading it to Wallace- to whom, anyway, I am reading something I always dreamt of being able to do as a parent. I think you can probably guess it from this line alone: Wallace sat completely still on the bed, eyes wide, not even daring to breathe, as I read, very quietly,
“Nobody ever goes in… and nobody ever comes out.”
“But… but WHY?” said Charlie Bucket and Wallace, simultaneously.
“That will have to wait till tomorrow” said I and Mrs Bucket simultaneously. Dahl really was, in the end, the best.
And the second I shall do tomorrow.







